After I have read a comment of

Dear Mustafa Akyol! 

U kidding or what? I have never heart such a nonsense!!!!!!!! The word  'Kemalist' is a western creation and you have taken it without criticism as you are not able to think by yourself. Your comment is ridiculous in many aspects.

But one thing is truth that the conservative forces are back in Turkey and that USA and Europa have played a great role in that matter. IN THEIR OWN INTEREST OF COURSE. All your comment is based in so called  'liberal' arguments. But your country and you as an asian male person are not from the geography which 'liberalism' is rooted. Probably you are too young to see that your lovely country is full of perverted sexual behaviour towards animals, kids and of course women!!!!! That s the only reason why something like headscarf issue has been created in a middle east country. 

Headscarf has nothing to do with Islam. But with the geography and the history of islamic countries. These countries have created nothing in the last centuries in the means of science. They will be not if such stupid  'liboşs' like you continue to preserve the fragile male libido control structures of these geographies!

You must read Freud to understand what I mean and not Forbes!!!! You think a man is a man if he has made enough money, no matter how. This is what oriental men call  'liberalism'. And it is completely unimportant for these 'liberal'  men how the women are going around. (By the way I couldn t forget the picture of  lady Gül besides Fr. Wulff. It was terrible!!!! She (Missis Gül) has no idea of official clothing!!!! One can write a book about her appearance.)

Is it important or is it not important?  Whatever the answer is, it is obvius that the answer is rooted in the libidinous structures of these men and NOT in their brain or in their attitude towards economy. The so called  'liberal' attitude is the outcome of a regressive sexual structure. You can see this regressive sexual behavior everywhere in Turkey. These are the so called  'conservative' men, who have diffulculties with their energy structures towards women. Remember the sentence of Iranian President Ahmedinecad. He once said, that a women without chador is an offense, an insult against a moslem man. This sentence is like a joke to me. U kidding or what? This is soo infantile, archaic and primitive that one can only laugh at it. But one is also tempted to analyse this structure by the 'Tiefenpsychologie' of Freud and Jung. It is sooo obvious that a man is speaking who couldn t conquer his oedipal complexes and believes that all women (!!!!!) in the world should treat him with care and not try to recall that he is a completely uninteresting dwarf for most of the women of this world. These are men, who couldn t overcome their infantil male wish to be omnipotent  toward female attraction. They want to be free from self-control. O.k. I must finish as I have no more time. 

By the way, are you the son of Taha Akyol? Just a question.

Bye 

belmontina

belmontina.blogspot.com